Categories
General

The Data Cloud?

As Paul Miller notes, “the Cloud” is increasingly prevalent in tech conversation these days. As if “cloud computing” weren’t a fuzzy enough term, now we have the “data cloud” which, if I understand Paul correctly, may just be a rebranding of the “semantic web” (itself a bit fuzzy for my tastes). Although it’s not clear to me from the article to what extent the “data cloud” represents a commodified data repository vs. a common framework to link everyone’s data using open standards.

I suppose I’ve been in technology long enough that I shouldn’t be making fun of buzzwords, especially when the movement to the cloud represents a real and positive phenomenon. But the semantic web needs more than rebranding. A quick search turned up this post from last year that lists what Nova Spivack identified as barriers to the adoption of the semantic web:

  1. A lack of tools
  2. Scaling challenges (what if you want to store a trillion+ triples?)
  3. Vision issues (how can we define a practical vision, for the low-hanging fruit?)
  4. Inadequate Content (not enough semantic data available)
  5. No killer apps
  6. Market education

One year later, I’m not sure we’re that much farther along.

By Daniel Tunkelang

High-Class Consultant.

2 replies on “The Data Cloud?”

“Although it’s not clear to me from the article to what extent the “data cloud” represents a commodified data repository vs. a common framework to link everyone’s data using open standards.”

Definitely the latter. Still, clearly not my most popular idea ever… 😦

I would argue (although maybe not in a comment) that ‘we’ have come a long way since Nova’s post, though. I think he’d agree, too…

Like

Comments are closed.