<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuning in to Google Music Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search geek weekly news update; Google social search leads the way &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4781</link>
		<dc:creator>Search geek weekly news update; Google social search leads the way &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4781</guid>
		<description>[...] Tuning in to Google Music Search – The Noisy Chanel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuning in to Google Music Search – The Noisy Chanel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4764</guid>
		<description>Daniel, from the link you sent:

&lt;i&gt;However, when I searched using song lyrics, Google often came up short. Searching for &quot;I walk alone,&quot; for example, brought up a song called &quot;I Walk Alone,&quot; from a WWE Raw wrestling album produced in 2007. It did not, however, bring up a song that famously repeats those words over and over again-- &quot;Boulevard of Broken Dreams&quot; from Green Day&#039;s 2004 album American Idiot.&lt;/i&gt;

I couldn&#039;t help but have the following thought when I read this: Of course the result didn&#039;t come up.  The words repeated over and over again.  Google&#039;s spam filters probably thought the song was a case of keyword stuffing! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, from the link you sent:</p>
<p><i>However, when I searched using song lyrics, Google often came up short. Searching for &#8220;I walk alone,&#8221; for example, brought up a song called &#8220;I Walk Alone,&#8221; from a WWE Raw wrestling album produced in 2007. It did not, however, bring up a song that famously repeats those words over and over again&#8211; &#8220;Boulevard of Broken Dreams&#8221; from Green Day&#8217;s 2004 album American Idiot.</i></p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but have the following thought when I read this: Of course the result didn&#8217;t come up.  The words repeated over and over again.  Google&#8217;s spam filters probably thought the song was a case of keyword stuffing! <img src='http://thenoisychannel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4763</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4763</guid>
		<description>Michael, you&#039;re right--I clearly need to rotate my search engine use more. You can read a comparison of Google and Yahoo&#039;s music search here:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/174654/handson_googles_music_search_is_just_soso.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, you&#8217;re right&#8211;I clearly need to rotate my search engine use more. You can read a comparison of Google and Yahoo&#8217;s music search here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/174654/handson_googles_music_search_is_just_soso.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/174654/handson_googles_music_search_is_just_soso.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael B</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4762</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4762</guid>
		<description>Though this is not the point of this article, Yahoo! had (and still have) the exact same feature for quite a while now. More to the point, the same feature on Yahoo! provides a more exploratory experience, actually allowing browsing the artist albums, lyrics, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though this is not the point of this article, Yahoo! had (and still have) the exact same feature for quite a while now. More to the point, the same feature on Yahoo! provides a more exploratory experience, actually allowing browsing the artist albums, lyrics, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected--Last.fm certainly offers more exploratory functionality than Pandora.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected&#8211;Last.fm certainly offers more exploratory functionality than Pandora.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/29/tuning-in-to-google-music-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2751#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Besides, much as Google’s default search leads many searchers to Wikipedia, a great starting point for exploratory search, the new music search leads users to Pandora, which is probably the leading engine for exploratory music search. &lt;/i&gt;

Really? You would call Pandora more exploratory than Last.fm?  Pandora does allow you, the user, to give relevance feedback on the ranked lists of songs that they present to you, so that by itself is already more interactive than Google currently allows.  But unless you switch stations completely (i.e. issue a new query) you will continue to get song in the order that Pandora wants to feed them to you.  No matter how diverse Pandora might make these lists, diversity != exploratory.  Non?

Last.fm is much more exploratory, and much heavier on the HCIR. Last.fm is still plagued by collaborative filtering, and I wish there were a way to get away from that more.  But at least it lets you choose your own path and pivot points through that filter, and you can wind up with an overall pathway very different than what any single collaborative filtering algorithm might have recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Besides, much as Google’s default search leads many searchers to Wikipedia, a great starting point for exploratory search, the new music search leads users to Pandora, which is probably the leading engine for exploratory music search. </i></p>
<p>Really? You would call Pandora more exploratory than Last.fm?  Pandora does allow you, the user, to give relevance feedback on the ranked lists of songs that they present to you, so that by itself is already more interactive than Google currently allows.  But unless you switch stations completely (i.e. issue a new query) you will continue to get song in the order that Pandora wants to feed them to you.  No matter how diverse Pandora might make these lists, diversity != exploratory.  Non?</p>
<p>Last.fm is much more exploratory, and much heavier on the HCIR. Last.fm is still plagued by collaborative filtering, and I wish there were a way to get away from that more.  But at least it lets you choose your own path and pivot points through that filter, and you can wind up with an overall pathway very different than what any single collaborative filtering algorithm might have recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

