<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Duplicate Tweets Spam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/15/are-duplicate-tweets-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/15/are-duplicate-tweets-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/15/are-duplicate-tweets-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4672</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2701#comment-4672</guid>
		<description>I believe the time frame is 24 hours (at least according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/14/cleaning-up-the-stream-twitter-kills-duplicate-tweets/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/a&gt;).

But you&#039;re right, actual spammers can easily defeat exact duplicate detection, while innocent duplication will be verboten. It&#039;s a problem, and I think Twitter is not only being heavy-handed, but also failing to recognize that it has played a part in creating this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the time frame is 24 hours (at least according to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/14/cleaning-up-the-stream-twitter-kills-duplicate-tweets/" rel="nofollow">TechCrunch</a>).</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right, actual spammers can easily defeat exact duplicate detection, while innocent duplication will be verboten. It&#8217;s a problem, and I think Twitter is not only being heavy-handed, but also failing to recognize that it has played a part in creating this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayna Dinsmore</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/15/are-duplicate-tweets-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayna Dinsmore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2701#comment-4671</guid>
		<description>So duplicate tweets are now taboo, will this result in work-arounds?  We already have the .@LilMissSocMedia starting comments so people not following both users can see a reply.  Will we now have 1st tweet as &quot;Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post www.blognamehere.com&quot; then to repeat later slightly changed as &quot;.Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post www.blognamehere.com&quot; and the third time would be &quot;..Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post www.blognamehere.com&quot;?  There are too many potential work-arounds with creative punctuation.  

Also - what about the &quot;great to see you&quot; posts you may send to a friend.  What if you send a tweet with the same  text 6 months later....it&#039;s not intended spamming, but will it get through?  I didn&#039;t see any mention of a time frame, so will a &#039;paused&#039; tweet eventually get released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So duplicate tweets are now taboo, will this result in work-arounds?  We already have the .@LilMissSocMedia starting comments so people not following both users can see a reply.  Will we now have 1st tweet as &#8220;Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post <a href="http://www.blognamehere.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blognamehere.com</a>&#8221; then to repeat later slightly changed as &#8220;.Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post <a href="http://www.blognamehere.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blognamehere.com</a>&#8221; and the third time would be &#8220;..Hey Everyone, Read my Blog post <a href="http://www.blognamehere.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blognamehere.com</a>&#8220;?  There are too many potential work-arounds with creative punctuation.  </p>
<p>Also &#8211; what about the &#8220;great to see you&#8221; posts you may send to a friend.  What if you send a tweet with the same  text 6 months later&#8230;.it&#8217;s not intended spamming, but will it get through?  I didn&#8217;t see any mention of a time frame, so will a &#8216;paused&#8217; tweet eventually get released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candy Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/15/are-duplicate-tweets-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-4669</link>
		<dc:creator>Candy Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2701#comment-4669</guid>
		<description>I am more after deduplication in services like Yoono. So many people update status in several places at once that if you use an aggregator you see the same tweets three times (Facebook, Twitter, and FriendFeed). This is not something Twitter can address - I wish aggregator services did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am more after deduplication in services like Yoono. So many people update status in several places at once that if you use an aggregator you see the same tweets three times (Facebook, Twitter, and FriendFeed). This is not something Twitter can address &#8211; I wish aggregator services did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
