Comments on: Google Updates Search Refinement Options http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/01/google-updates-search-refinement-options/ Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Daniel Tunkelang http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/01/google-updates-search-refinement-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4506 Daniel Tunkelang Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:05:08 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2644#comment-4506 I agree. I wonder if they deliberately make that operation difficult because it's computationally expensive. Would be nice if someone built a Firefox add-on that did iterations for you. I agree. I wonder if they deliberately make that operation difficult because it’s computationally expensive. Would be nice if someone built a Firefox add-on that did iterations for you.

]]> By: jeremy http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/10/01/google-updates-search-refinement-options/comment-page-1/#comment-4505 jeremy Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:07:22 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2644#comment-4505 I'm happy to see these efforts continue. I still want "sort by least recent", though. You can simulate it by iteratively restricting your dates to earlier and earlier time periods -- a painful, manual process. And it really doesn't give you the resolution that you need, unless you use really tight windows. Which makes the process even more difficult by increasing the number of iterations needed. I’m happy to see these efforts continue.

I still want “sort by least recent”, though. You can simulate it by iteratively restricting your dates to earlier and earlier time periods — a painful, manual process. And it really doesn’t give you the resolution that you need, unless you use really tight windows. Which makes the process even more difficult by increasing the number of iterations needed.

]]>