http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/09/09/cikm-2009-accepted-papers/ Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/09/09/cikm-2009-accepted-papers/comment-page-1/#comment-4369 Daniel Tunkelang Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:23:05 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2523#comment-4369 Fair point. I've never attended either, but I've heard great things about the WSDM conferences. I've heard more mixed reviews of WWW, but I supposed that is to be expected of a large conference with 10+ parallel sessions. Fair point. I’ve never attended either, but I’ve heard great things about the WSDM conferences. I’ve heard more mixed reviews of WWW, but I supposed that is to be expected of a large conference with 10+ parallel sessions.

]]> http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/09/09/cikm-2009-accepted-papers/comment-page-1/#comment-4368 Brian Davison Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:14:40 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2523#comment-4368 Those of us in the web search space like to think that the WWW conference is at least as big as SIGIR, and the single-track WSDM, while small, also has really good work in this area. Those of us in the web search space like to think that the WWW conference is at least as big as SIGIR, and the single-track WSDM, while small, also has really good work in this area.

]]> http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/09/09/cikm-2009-accepted-papers/comment-page-1/#comment-4367 Max L. Wilson Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:53:25 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2523#comment-4367 looks interesting. I see a couple of people from FAST in that list too. Ryen's, in particular tho, looks like it'll be good. looks interesting. I see a couple of people from FAST in that list too. Ryen’s, in particular tho, looks like it’ll be good.

]]>