<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn No Longer Allowing Invite Messages?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking: Theory and Practice &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking: Theory and Practice &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>[...] sent out a targeted message (in fact, a invite with personalized message&#8211;a feature I recently feared they&#8217;d killed). The results were overwhelmingly positive. I&#8217;m not sure how many of the people I contacted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sent out a targeted message (in fact, a invite with personalized message&#8211;a feature I recently feared they&#8217;d killed). The results were overwhelmingly positive. I&#8217;m not sure how many of the people I contacted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4249</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4249</guid>
		<description>Looks like the problem is resolved. Glad it was just a bug / moment of temporary insanity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the problem is resolved. Glad it was just a bug / moment of temporary insanity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4245</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4245</guid>
		<description>According to the customer service message (see the update), it is a glitch. I hope so. In the meantime, I&#039;m certainly more cautious about inviting people. I customize messages on most of my invitation requests--it&#039;s an old-school sort of CAPTCHA where I prove I&#039;m not a spammer by showing I care enough to write a personal message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the customer service message (see the update), it is a glitch. I hope so. In the meantime, I&#8217;m certainly more cautious about inviting people. I customize messages on most of my invitation requests&#8211;it&#8217;s an old-school sort of CAPTCHA where I prove I&#8217;m not a spammer by showing I care enough to write a personal message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stavros Macrakis</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>Stavros Macrakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Agreed that this is an annoying change.  I should be able to give context to my LinkedIn invites, e.g. &quot;Nice to see you on LinkedIn -- you may recall we worked together on the ABC123 project in 1995.&quot; or &quot;I enjoyed the discussion we had at SIGIR.&quot; or whatever.

          -s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that this is an annoying change.  I should be able to give context to my LinkedIn invites, e.g. &#8220;Nice to see you on LinkedIn &#8212; you may recall we worked together on the ABC123 project in 1995.&#8221; or &#8220;I enjoyed the discussion we had at SIGIR.&#8221; or whatever.</p>
<p>          -s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Schaffer</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Schaffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

Excellent post!

It is interesting if LinkedIn is adding this restriction to its countless others.  For a social networking site that requires, in its User Agreement, that you only connect with people you know, the option to personalize the invitation was always an option.  I always thought that that was weird...after all, if you were trying to get back in touch with someone that you knew, wouldn&#039;t it make sense to allow you to personalize the invitation?

I am hoping that this is just a temporary glitch, as have some other problems been in the past.  I can&#039;t see how LinkedIn can try to monetize the customization of invitation messages...it just doesn&#039;t make sense.

- Neal Schaffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>Excellent post!</p>
<p>It is interesting if LinkedIn is adding this restriction to its countless others.  For a social networking site that requires, in its User Agreement, that you only connect with people you know, the option to personalize the invitation was always an option.  I always thought that that was weird&#8230;after all, if you were trying to get back in touch with someone that you knew, wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to allow you to personalize the invitation?</p>
<p>I am hoping that this is just a temporary glitch, as have some other problems been in the past.  I can&#8217;t see how LinkedIn can try to monetize the customization of invitation messages&#8230;it just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>- Neal Schaffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4234</guid>
		<description>Like Wyclef says to Shakira, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygctbqBijFk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;No fighting!&lt;/a&gt;&quot;

Stefano, that&#039;s a good point--this may be an indirect monetization strategy. But in that case they&#039;d do well to announce it--no point in pushing a freemium model unless people know what you&#039;re up-selling. I give them the benefit of the doubt and see this as a misguided way to fight spam. Or a bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Wyclef says to Shakira, &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygctbqBijFk" rel="nofollow">No fighting!</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Stefano, that&#8217;s a good point&#8211;this may be an indirect monetization strategy. But in that case they&#8217;d do well to announce it&#8211;no point in pushing a freemium model unless people know what you&#8217;re up-selling. I give them the benefit of the doubt and see this as a misguided way to fight spam. Or a bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit Andrews</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>With you on this one, Daniel. I much prefer invitations saying something like, &quot;It was fun to be on that panel at SIGIR. Wow, you&#039;re smart, and you have a great left hook!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With you on this one, Daniel. I much prefer invitations saying something like, &#8220;It was fun to be on that panel at SIGIR. Wow, you&#8217;re smart, and you have a great left hook!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Bernardi</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/08/18/linkedin-no-longer-allowing-invite-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Bernardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=2461#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s just to have more people sign up for their premium services and use the otherwise useless InMail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s just to have more people sign up for their premium services and use the otherwise useless InMail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

