<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mathew Ingram: Google Helps Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not All Google Critics Are Bigots &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Not All Google Critics Are Bigots &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>[...] easily cut Google off by configuring robots.txt. Granted, the newspapers are now locked into a prisoner&#8217;s dilemma, but they should at least take some responsibility for putting themselves in that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] easily cut Google off by configuring robots.txt. Granted, the newspapers are now locked into a prisoner&#8217;s dilemma, but they should at least take some responsibility for putting themselves in that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not by Links Alone &#171; Networked News</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-3665</link>
		<dc:creator>Not by Links Alone &#171; Networked News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-3665</guid>
		<description>[...] it all comes down to a battle between whether Google encourages “hit-and-run” visits or “qualified leads.” I don&#8217;t doubt that searchers from Google often stick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it all comes down to a battle between whether Google encourages “hit-and-run” visits or “qualified leads.” I don&#8217;t doubt that searchers from Google often stick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-2912</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-2912</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a nice comment thread over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/google-helps-newspapers-period/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ingram&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; where he actually seemed to accept a commenter&#039;s argument that Google is &quot;bad for newspapers, good for the world&quot;.  Other commenters also take a stance that seems closer to mine than to Ingram&#039;s. Finally, Ingram and I did find at least one point of agreement &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dtunkelang+mathewi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.

I believe I&#039;m open minded and ready to admit I&#039;m wrong if I&#039;m thus persuaded. Believe me, I&#039;d much rather be wrong, since that might make me much less depressed about the status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a nice comment thread over at <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/google-helps-newspapers-period/" rel="nofollow">Ingram&#8217;s post</a> where he actually seemed to accept a commenter&#8217;s argument that Google is &#8220;bad for newspapers, good for the world&#8221;.  Other commenters also take a stance that seems closer to mine than to Ingram&#8217;s. Finally, Ingram and I did find at least one point of agreement <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=dtunkelang+mathewi" rel="nofollow">on Twitter</a>.</p>
<p>I believe I&#8217;m open minded and ready to admit I&#8217;m wrong if I&#8217;m thus persuaded. Believe me, I&#8217;d much rather be wrong, since that might make me much less depressed about the status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-2911</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-2911</guid>
		<description>Fight! Fight! 

;-)

Seriously, though, Dave, I think you need to elaborate, even if just a bit.  Or point to a few sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fight! Fight! </p>
<p> <img src='http://thenoisychannel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, though, Dave, I think you need to elaborate, even if just a bit.  Or point to a few sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-2904</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-2904</guid>
		<description>Dave, thanks for stopping by. As you&#039;ll see, &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenoisychannel.com/?s=masnick&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I do read Techdirt&lt;/a&gt; but don&#039;t always agree with it. Your saying that there&#039;s an easy rebuttal is, well, a bit too facile a rebuttal for my tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, thanks for stopping by. As you&#8217;ll see, <a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/?s=masnick" rel="nofollow">I do read Techdirt</a> but don&#8217;t always agree with it. Your saying that there&#8217;s an easy rebuttal is, well, a bit too facile a rebuttal for my tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Taylor</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/04/20/mathew-ingram-google-helps-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1972#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>You need to do more reading before you&#039;re ready for the big leagues on this issue.  All due respect, there is simply too much easy rebuttal of your facile arguments out there for any serious observer of this issue to spend any time dealing with you.

Go read Techdirt.  Come back when you&#039;re ready.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to do more reading before you&#8217;re ready for the big leagues on this issue.  All due respect, there is simply too much easy rebuttal of your facile arguments out there for any serious observer of this issue to spend any time dealing with you.</p>
<p>Go read Techdirt.  Come back when you&#8217;re ready.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
