<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Buy The Cow When You Can Hear It Moo For Free?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/17/why-buy-the-cow-when-you-can-hear-it-moo-for-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/17/why-buy-the-cow-when-you-can-hear-it-moo-for-free/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Young</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/17/why-buy-the-cow-when-you-can-hear-it-moo-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2399</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1660#comment-2399</guid>
		<description>The short answer, by my lights, is yes, absolutely. But note that what drives the price of the moo to zero is more than that it&#039;s free to copy. It&#039;s an &quot;experience good,&quot; in the economic jargon, meaning people don&#039;t know whether it&#039;s worth paying for till after they&#039;ve heard it. It has close substitutes, meaning the horse&#039;s bray is nearly as amusing.  It&#039;s &quot;non-rivalrous,&quot; meaning my enjoyment of it doesn&#039;t impair yours. And it&#039;s &quot;non-excludable,&quot; meaning you couldn&#039;t really prevent my enjoyment even if you wanted to. The only characteristic the moo has going for it is maybe that it&#039;s durable; unlike news, we never tire of our cow noises.

Even if it&#039;s not inevitable that content that can be reproduced for free will be free, I suspect that most of us would do well to accept it as inevitable anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer, by my lights, is yes, absolutely. But note that what drives the price of the moo to zero is more than that it&#8217;s free to copy. It&#8217;s an &#8220;experience good,&#8221; in the economic jargon, meaning people don&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;s worth paying for till after they&#8217;ve heard it. It has close substitutes, meaning the horse&#8217;s bray is nearly as amusing.  It&#8217;s &#8220;non-rivalrous,&#8221; meaning my enjoyment of it doesn&#8217;t impair yours. And it&#8217;s &#8220;non-excludable,&#8221; meaning you couldn&#8217;t really prevent my enjoyment even if you wanted to. The only characteristic the moo has going for it is maybe that it&#8217;s durable; unlike news, we never tire of our cow noises.</p>
<p>Even if it&#8217;s not inevitable that content that can be reproduced for free will be free, I suspect that most of us would do well to accept it as inevitable anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/17/why-buy-the-cow-when-you-can-hear-it-moo-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2397</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1660#comment-2397</guid>
		<description>Point taken. So should we simply accept the inevitability that content that can be reproduced for free will be reproduced for free? It certainly would simplify the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken. So should we simply accept the inevitability that content that can be reproduced for free will be reproduced for free? It certainly would simplify the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Young</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/17/why-buy-the-cow-when-you-can-hear-it-moo-for-free/comment-page-1/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1660#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the obvious, if facile, answer to your question that you might want its milk too? It&#039;s much harder to make a satisfying digital representation of matter for a lactophile than it is to make one of sound for an audiophile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the obvious, if facile, answer to your question that you might want its milk too? It&#8217;s much harder to make a satisfying digital representation of matter for a lactophile than it is to make one of sound for an audiophile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
