<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARS Automation Services &#187; Best Links for RDA</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>MARS Automation Services &#187; Best Links for RDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/ &#8211; This is another well written and easy to understand explanation of FRBR. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/ &#8211; This is another well written and easy to understand explanation of FRBR. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zachary_Quinto&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My name is Sylar&lt;/a&gt;! OK, I won&#039;t push my luck with Trekkie jokes...

Thanks for the kind words--I may not be a librarian, but I am a big fan of library science. And I do want to see the latest tools for supporting information seeking (some of which I&#039;m helping to build!) become more affordable and thus ubiquitous for libraries. I am sure we&#039;ll get there--time commodifies all. But I suspect that is cold consolation for librarians with no patience and even less budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zachary_Quinto" rel="nofollow">My name is Sylar</a>! OK, I won&#8217;t push my luck with Trekkie jokes&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words&#8211;I may not be a librarian, but I am a big fan of library science. And I do want to see the latest tools for supporting information seeking (some of which I&#8217;m helping to build!) become more affordable and thus ubiquitous for libraries. I am sure we&#8217;ll get there&#8211;time commodifies all. But I suspect that is cold consolation for librarians with no patience and even less budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Dammit Jim, I&#039;m a technologist, not a librarian!

I find that, as a cataloger (or &quot;metadata specialist&quot;, in fancy language), I straddle both worlds. Thanks for Kelley&#039;s info. Great blog, by the way. I&#039;m going to send it to all of my technology-forward librarian buddies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dammit Jim, I&#8217;m a technologist, not a librarian!</p>
<p>I find that, as a cataloger (or &#8220;metadata specialist&#8221;, in fancy language), I straddle both worlds. Thanks for Kelley&#8217;s info. Great blog, by the way. I&#8217;m going to send it to all of my technology-forward librarian buddies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>Amy, I don&#039;t know--I&#039;m a technologist, not a librarian. Perhaps Kelley can offer a more informed response--you can find her contact info &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bsu.edu/common/profile/0,,5404---search,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy, I don&#8217;t know&#8211;I&#8217;m a technologist, not a librarian. Perhaps Kelley can offer a more informed response&#8211;you can find her contact info <a href="http://www.bsu.edu/common/profile/0,,5404---search,00.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3762</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-3762</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of work-level records because they avoid the duplication of efforts and contain consistent, accurate information. But what entity is going to create and maintain these records? Will they be freely accessible, and will everyone be able to contribute to them? As LC moves further away from the authorities business, I worry that work-level records, which seem to be a huge part of the FRBR model, will fall to a subscription-based entity (like OCLC). Will this become yet another tool that smaller libraries cannot afford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of work-level records because they avoid the duplication of efforts and contain consistent, accurate information. But what entity is going to create and maintain these records? Will they be freely accessible, and will everyone be able to contribute to them? As LC moves further away from the authorities business, I worry that work-level records, which seem to be a huge part of the FRBR model, will fall to a subscription-based entity (like OCLC). Will this become yet another tool that smaller libraries cannot afford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MARS Authority Control &#187; Helpful links on RDA, FRBR, and FRAD</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-3708</link>
		<dc:creator>MARS Authority Control &#187; Helpful links on RDA, FRBR, and FRAD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-3708</guid>
		<description>[...] http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/ - This is another well written and easy to understand explanation of FRBR. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/" rel="nofollow">http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/</a> &#8211; This is another well written and easy to understand explanation of FRBR. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Code4Lib and FRBR &#171; Celeripedean</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/comment-page-1/#comment-2288</link>
		<dc:creator>Code4Lib and FRBR &#171; Celeripedean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1605#comment-2288</guid>
		<description>[...] blog and Kelly McGrath&#8217;s explanation of FRBR for a larger audience (go directly to: http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/) helped me to better understand FRBR for catalogers. Kelly brings up a good point; a lot of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog and Kelly McGrath&#8217;s explanation of FRBR for a larger audience (go directly to: <a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/" rel="nofollow">http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/03/10/functional-requirements-for-bibliographic-records/</a>) helped me to better understand FRBR for catalogers. Kelly brings up a good point; a lot of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

