<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Delivers a Bundle of Joy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Arduini</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-10144</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Arduini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 08:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-10144</guid>
		<description>I believe that focusing on data management is a core essential for enterprise search systems both software- and hardware-based.  Ideally the search efficiency is key and it seems that appliance-accompanied solutions are the highest performing due to their optimized collection methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that focusing on data management is a core essential for enterprise search systems both software- and hardware-based.  Ideally the search efficiency is key and it seems that appliance-accompanied solutions are the highest performing due to their optimized collection methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Does Your Organization Use SharePoint? &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-2195</link>
		<dc:creator>How Does Your Organization Use SharePoint? &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-2195</guid>
		<description>[...] the increasingly tight integration of SharePoint and FAST, Microsoft&#8217;s enterprise search offering, my interest in how people use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the increasingly tight integration of SharePoint and FAST, Microsoft&#8217;s enterprise search offering, my interest in how people use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>It will be an interesting year. Online retail is one of the few &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.shop.org/2009/01/02/digital-retail-in-2009/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bright spots&lt;/a&gt; in the current economy, so I&#039;m not surprised that FAST wants a piece of it. And, even though I think we can safely agree that Endeca is the leader in that market segment, I can assure you that none of us at Endeca are complacent about it. Especially since FAST&#039;s &quot;interaction management&quot; messaging gives me and my colleagues more than a little deja vu.

To be clear, I think that FAST + SharePoint is a legitimate strategy for Microsoft, even if it&#039;s not their only one. SharePoint has been a winner for Microsoft&#039;s business division, and search is evidently one of its sore points. Besides, as you said, they can&#039;t be everything to everybody.

I guess we&#039;ll find out over the next months / years if they can walk and chew gum at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be an interesting year. Online retail is one of the few <a href="http://blog.shop.org/2009/01/02/digital-retail-in-2009/" rel="nofollow">bright spots</a> in the current economy, so I&#8217;m not surprised that FAST wants a piece of it. And, even though I think we can safely agree that Endeca is the leader in that market segment, I can assure you that none of us at Endeca are complacent about it. Especially since FAST&#8217;s &#8220;interaction management&#8221; messaging gives me and my colleagues more than a little deja vu.</p>
<p>To be clear, I think that FAST + SharePoint is a legitimate strategy for Microsoft, even if it&#8217;s not their only one. SharePoint has been a winner for Microsoft&#8217;s business division, and search is evidently one of its sore points. Besides, as you said, they can&#8217;t be everything to everybody.</p>
<p>I guess we&#8217;ll find out over the next months / years if they can walk and chew gum at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriaan Bloem</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1959</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriaan Bloem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1959</guid>
		<description>Well, that would certainly be advantageous to Endeca... but I don&#039;t think Microsoft is going to give up on the (presumably quite profitable) eCommerce scenarios, just yet ;) 

If anything, that was one of the two major announcements (FAST for Internet Business), with a nice demo as well. It makes sense for Microsoft to more clearly define use cases for ESP and market them (FAST was always trying to be everything to everybody), and they&#039;ve done some interesting things for the Internet Business version. 

I&#039;m going to have a close look at how Endeca, FAST and Autonomy are each supporting that scenario in different ways -- it&#039;ll be more important than ever for customers to know what the differences are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that would certainly be advantageous to Endeca&#8230; but I don&#8217;t think Microsoft is going to give up on the (presumably quite profitable) eCommerce scenarios, just yet <img src='http://thenoisychannel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>If anything, that was one of the two major announcements (FAST for Internet Business), with a nice demo as well. It makes sense for Microsoft to more clearly define use cases for ESP and market them (FAST was always trying to be everything to everybody), and they&#8217;ve done some interesting things for the Internet Business version. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to have a close look at how Endeca, FAST and Autonomy are each supporting that scenario in different ways &#8212; it&#8217;ll be more important than ever for customers to know what the differences are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>Adriaan, thanks for the link. I cited Microsoft&#039;s promise of 10 years of support for current FAST customers in my post, including those on not using Windows, let alone SharePoint. I just wonder how much Microsoft will have their hearts into supporting something they seem to be leaving behind. Yes, I work for a competitor, but I think my reaction is a reasonable one.

In any case, it seems to me (and it seems you mostly agree) that the big news is that FAST will be available as a cheap add-on for SharePoint, and that Microsoft is betting on the bundle being worth more than its parts. It&#039;s certainly a defensible strategy, and consistent with Microsoft&#039;s history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adriaan, thanks for the link. I cited Microsoft&#8217;s promise of 10 years of support for current FAST customers in my post, including those on not using Windows, let alone SharePoint. I just wonder how much Microsoft will have their hearts into supporting something they seem to be leaving behind. Yes, I work for a competitor, but I think my reaction is a reasonable one.</p>
<p>In any case, it seems to me (and it seems you mostly agree) that the big news is that FAST will be available as a cheap add-on for SharePoint, and that Microsoft is betting on the bundle being worth more than its parts. It&#8217;s certainly a defensible strategy, and consistent with Microsoft&#8217;s history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriaan Bloem</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1896</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriaan Bloem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1896</guid>
		<description>There were announcements for FAST Search for Internet Business and FAST Search for SharePoint, but those were just PR highlights -- the gist is, the &quot;for SharePoint&quot; will be relatively cheap, and &quot;current FAST customers&quot; will be supported in the future -- even when they&#039;re on Unix/Linux. http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1498-Microsoft-discloses-plans-for-FAST-ESP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were announcements for FAST Search for Internet Business and FAST Search for SharePoint, but those were just PR highlights &#8212; the gist is, the &#8220;for SharePoint&#8221; will be relatively cheap, and &#8220;current FAST customers&#8221; will be supported in the future &#8212; even when they&#8217;re on Unix/Linux. <a href="http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1498-Microsoft-discloses-plans-for-FAST-ESP" rel="nofollow">http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1498-Microsoft-discloses-plans-for-FAST-ESP</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Will that be a distinct product? I couldn&#039;t find anything on the official SharePoint blog.

http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/search.aspx?q=ESP+for+SharePoint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Will that be a distinct product? I couldn&#8217;t find anything on the official SharePoint blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/search.aspx?q=ESP+for+SharePoint" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/search.aspx?q=ESP+for+SharePoint</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simonbaptist</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/10/microsoft-delivers-a-bundle-of-joy/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>simonbaptist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1392#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>I was part of the FAST acquisition but 100% have no inside knowldge of this announcement but I would think the key point is:  &quot;ESP for SharePoint &quot; at that price point and not plain ESP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was part of the FAST acquisition but 100% have no inside knowldge of this announcement but I would think the key point is:  &#8220;ESP for SharePoint &#8221; at that price point and not plain ESP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

