Comments on: Comments I Read: Jeremy Pickens http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/ Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Daniel Tunkelang http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-2042 Daniel Tunkelang Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:32:27 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-2042 I'll vote for "What Would Ungoogle Do?" I’ll vote for “What Would Ungoogle Do?”

]]> By: jeremy http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-2041 jeremy Sun, 22 Feb 2009 04:26:53 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-2041 No, you read too much into me. It really should be the-love-of-what-google-stands-for-is-the-root-of-all-evil.org. :-) No, you read too much into me. It really should be the-love-of-what-google-stands-for-is-the-root-of-all-evil.org.

:-)

]]> By: Gene Golovchinsky http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-2040 Gene Golovchinsky Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:48:48 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-2040 How about the-love-of-google-is-the-root-of-all-evil.org? How about the-love-of-google-is-the-root-of-all-evil.org?

]]> By: Blogs I Read: FXPAL Blog | The Noisy Channel http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-2010 Blogs I Read: FXPAL Blog | The Noisy Channel Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:10:37 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-2010 [...] writing it! But, given the quality of comments on this blog from FXPALers Gene Golovchinsky and Jeremy Pickens, I’m expecting great things from the FXPAL [...] [...] writing it! But, given the quality of comments on this blog from FXPALers Gene Golovchinsky and Jeremy Pickens, I’m expecting great things from the FXPAL [...]

]]> By: Daniel Tunkelang http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-1826 Daniel Tunkelang Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:01:08 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-1826 It would be nice to be able to link related posts across the blogosphere--whether by mutual agreement or asymmetrically--so that the comment threads weren't scattered. As far as I know, FriendFeed, Disqus, BackType, et cetera don't make this easy or even possible. Techmeme and other aggregators have no trouble identifying clusters of related blog posts, but they don't take the extra step of offering a unified comment feed. It's a great opportunity! In any case, I'm looking forward to your blog. Neither slimpickens.com nor ungoogle.com are available; what domain did you register? It would be nice to be able to link related posts across the blogosphere–whether by mutual agreement or asymmetrically–so that the comment threads weren’t scattered. As far as I know, FriendFeed, Disqus, BackType, et cetera don’t make this easy or even possible.

Techmeme and other aggregators have no trouble identifying clusters of related blog posts, but they don’t take the extra step of offering a unified comment feed. It’s a great opportunity!

In any case, I’m looking forward to your blog. Neither slimpickens.com nor ungoogle.com are available; what domain did you register?

]]> By: jeremy http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-1824 jeremy Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:49:48 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-1824 Jason: Yes, the world will be changed; it will go from having 240.1 million blogs to 240.100001 million blogs ;-) Jason: Yes, the world will be changed; it will go from having 240.1 million blogs to 240.100001 million blogs ;-)

]]> By: jeremy http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-1823 jeremy Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:48:34 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-1823 :-) But seriously, guys.. maybe I'm just not up to snuff on the technology, but how do you follow a threaded discussion across blogs? Suppose we want to really get in to something good. If my response is a blogpost, and then Daniel's response is another blog post, and then Jason and Mark each respond with blogposts.. how am I supposed to follow that conversational thread? Yes, there are trackbacks. But those are only single, point-to-point devices. They don't really let me reconstruct the narrative thread. So if someone could explain to me how to do this, I'd be happy to take the longer, more interesting discussions "off-comment", and onto a standalone-blog. Oh, but FWIW, I did register my domain last night. :-) :-)

But seriously, guys.. maybe I’m just not up to snuff on the technology, but how do you follow a threaded discussion across blogs? Suppose we want to really get in to something good. If my response is a blogpost, and then Daniel’s response is another blog post, and then Jason and Mark each respond with blogposts.. how am I supposed to follow that conversational thread? Yes, there are trackbacks. But those are only single, point-to-point devices. They don’t really let me reconstruct the narrative thread.

So if someone could explain to me how to do this, I’d be happy to take the longer, more interesting discussions “off-comment”, and onto a standalone-blog.

Oh, but FWIW, I did register my domain last night. :-)

]]> By: Jason Adams http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/02/07/comments-i-read-jeremy-pickens/comment-page-1/#comment-1821 Jason Adams Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:04:41 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1366#comment-1821 One day he'll decide that a comment is just too long and it deserves a post of its own, and then the world will be changed. Or at least the blogosphere will be. One day he’ll decide that a comment is just too long and it deserves a post of its own, and then the world will be changed. Or at least the blogosphere will be.

]]>