Comments on: Cyber Pollution: Not a Victimless Crime http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:45:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Daniel Tunkelang http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-1755 Daniel Tunkelang Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:39:14 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1308#comment-1755 That was low...but it seems the technology is having some effect. I've slowed down a bit! That was low…but it seems the technology is having some effect. I’ve slowed down a bit!

]]> By: Rob Gonzalez http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-1754 Rob Gonzalez Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:10:05 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1308#comment-1754 I wonder if this technology can be used to keep us from being inundated by your deluge of IR posts on a daily basis... ;-) I wonder if this technology can be used to keep us from being inundated by your deluge of IR posts on a daily basis… ;-)

]]> By: Ragy Thomas http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-1689 Ragy Thomas Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:03:56 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1308#comment-1689 thanks for the reference, Daniel. Check out this interesting news from Nielson. http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/ thanks for the reference, Daniel.
Check out this interesting news from Nielson.
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/31/nielsen-deletes-reply-to-all-button/

]]> By: Daniel Tunkelang http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-1688 Daniel Tunkelang Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:47:25 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1308#comment-1688 Advertisers pay, not users. And the incentive for advertisers to pay is that users will actually opt in to receive their messages, since the users are being paid for their attention. This is opt-in advertising, not entirely unlike Microsoft's cashback scheme. http://search.live.com/cashback Advertisers pay, not users. And the incentive for advertisers to pay is that users will actually opt in to receive their messages, since the users are being paid for their attention.

This is opt-in advertising, not entirely unlike Microsoft’s cashback scheme.

http://search.live.com/cashback

]]> By: Gene Golovchinsky http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/31/cyber-pollution-not-a-victimless-crime/comment-page-1/#comment-1687 Gene Golovchinsky Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:15:04 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1308#comment-1687 what's the incentive for "advertisers" (spanmers) to opt into this system? And to do users have to pay for a rupeemail subscription, or do advertisers pay its entire cost? what’s the incentive for “advertisers” (spanmers) to opt into this system? And to do users have to pay for a rupeemail subscription, or do advertisers pay its entire cost?

]]>