<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconsidering Relevance: Now on YouTube!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Google Evil? The Great Debate &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Google Evil? The Great Debate &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 19:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1305#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>[...] For the most part, I think the answer is yes. I remember the pre-Google world, and I&#8217;m much happier living in this one. Nonetheless, I believe that Google, by resting on its laurels, is dragging the rest of the world down it its complacency. Do I blame Google for its complacency? Yes, I do, and I&#8217;ve told them as much. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the most part, I think the answer is yes. I remember the pre-Google world, and I&#8217;m much happier living in this one. Nonetheless, I believe that Google, by resting on its laurels, is dragging the rest of the world down it its complacency. Do I blame Google for its complacency? Yes, I do, and I&#8217;ve told them as much. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1305#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words. &quot;Case study in social media&quot; is a much more generous term than &quot;social media whore&quot;.

As for references, you can find them all on the slide notes at SlideShare (or if you download the presentation).

http://www.slideshare.net/dtunkelang/google-tech-talk-reconsidering-relevance-presentation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words. &#8220;Case study in social media&#8221; is a much more generous term than &#8220;social media whore&#8221;.</p>
<p>As for references, you can find them all on the slide notes at SlideShare (or if you download the presentation).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/dtunkelang/google-tech-talk-reconsidering-relevance-presentation" rel="nofollow">http://www.slideshare.net/dtunkelang/google-tech-talk-reconsidering-relevance-presentation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1305#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>Nice!

You&#039;re becoming a great case study in Social Media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice!</p>
<p>You&#8217;re becoming a great case study in Social Media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/01/29/reconsidering-relevance-now-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=1305#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>saracevic, T. (1996) Relevance Reconsidered.

how about a bibliography of the remaining references? either way , nice talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>saracevic, T. (1996) Relevance Reconsidered.</p>
<p>how about a bibliography of the remaining references? either way , nice talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

