<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Government Information More Accessible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/16/making-government-information-more-accessible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/16/making-government-information-more-accessible/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/16/making-government-information-more-accessible/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=976#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>I realize that pointing fingers within government bureaucracy is tricky, and I didn&#039;t intend to single out the judiciary branch.

As for the cost-recouping, Carl Malamud argues that:

In 2006, the fund received $447.8 million, but they could only figure out what to do with $301.2 million, the so-called “obligated balance.” In other words, they had a “significant unobligated balance” of $146.6 million. At 8 cents per page for a PACER Document, they could give away 1.8 billion pages of documents to the public and still have all the money they need to pay for their computers.


I can&#039;t verify his numbers. Regardless, 8 cents a page is significant for these bloated documents--and it&#039;s more than the cost of photocopying them. Something seems very wrong about that in what is purportedly an information age, where the marginal cost of distribution is essentially zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that pointing fingers within government bureaucracy is tricky, and I didn&#8217;t intend to single out the judiciary branch.</p>
<p>As for the cost-recouping, Carl Malamud argues that:</p>
<p>In 2006, the fund received $447.8 million, but they could only figure out what to do with $301.2 million, the so-called “obligated balance.” In other words, they had a “significant unobligated balance” of $146.6 million. At 8 cents per page for a PACER Document, they could give away 1.8 billion pages of documents to the public and still have all the money they need to pay for their computers.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t verify his numbers. Regardless, 8 cents a page is significant for these bloated documents&#8211;and it&#8217;s more than the cost of photocopying them. Something seems very wrong about that in what is purportedly an information age, where the marginal cost of distribution is essentially zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Pikas</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/16/making-government-information-more-accessible/comment-page-1/#comment-1179</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Pikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=976#comment-1179</guid>
		<description>FWIW - US Courts does not want to charge for the documents, they&#039;re forced (by Congress) to recoup the cost of the service. They made the fees as low as possible.  Also, you can get access now at some depository libraries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW &#8211; US Courts does not want to charge for the documents, they&#8217;re forced (by Congress) to recoup the cost of the service. They made the fees as low as possible.  Also, you can get access now at some depository libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

