<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook More Trusted Than Google (!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/15/facebook-more-trusted-than-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/15/facebook-more-trusted-than-google/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/15/facebook-more-trusted-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=969#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>I try hard not to propagate shoddy reporting, and I&#039;m glad I resisted the urge to comment on the WSJ piece before Google and Larry Lessig spoke for themselves.

As for the Ponemon study, I don&#039;t have any reason to doubt its accuracy. You&#039;re right that Google may be a victim of media bias. But I also think some of the distrust is the result of Google&#039;s being a bit cavalier about privacy concerns. Facebook, for better or worse, took the opportunity to learn from experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try hard not to propagate shoddy reporting, and I&#8217;m glad I resisted the urge to comment on the WSJ piece before Google and Larry Lessig spoke for themselves.</p>
<p>As for the Ponemon study, I don&#8217;t have any reason to doubt its accuracy. You&#8217;re right that Google may be a victim of media bias. But I also think some of the distrust is the result of Google&#8217;s being a bit cavalier about privacy concerns. Facebook, for better or worse, took the opportunity to learn from experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Heller</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/12/15/facebook-more-trusted-than-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Heller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=969#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.  This is very surprising.  As someone who has written alot about both companies, I have started to see a shift in trust away from Google, though a lot of that may just be because of &quot;incorrect&quot; journalism.  By that, I am referring to articles like the one in today&#039;s Wall Street Journal, which attacks Google on net neutrality.  Google has already written a response that shows the WSJ as misinformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  This is very surprising.  As someone who has written alot about both companies, I have started to see a shift in trust away from Google, though a lot of that may just be because of &#8220;incorrect&#8221; journalism.  By that, I am referring to articles like the one in today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, which attacks Google on net neutrality.  Google has already written a response that shows the WSJ as misinformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

