<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harvesting Knowledge for Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/27/harvesting-knowledge-for-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/27/harvesting-knowledge-for-wikipedia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/27/harvesting-knowledge-for-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=920#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Well, the spamming value is predicated on how the logs are used. It&#039;s the privacy concerns that surely hold back the Wikimedia Foundation from sharing this data. I am certain that the logs could be scrubbed in such a way that they&#039;d provide useful information without disclosing any personally identifiable data. But I can see how the Wikimedia Foundation would be concerned about starting down a slippery slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the spamming value is predicated on how the logs are used. It&#8217;s the privacy concerns that surely hold back the Wikimedia Foundation from sharing this data. I am certain that the logs could be scrubbed in such a way that they&#8217;d provide useful information without disclosing any personally identifiable data. But I can see how the Wikimedia Foundation would be concerned about starting down a slippery slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Davson</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/27/harvesting-knowledge-for-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Davson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 02:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=920#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had similar discussions with colleagues.  But we are interested in all queries, and similarly I&#039;d love to see the web server logs for wikipedia (which I don&#039;t seem to find anywhere).  Both provide some broad measures of the interests of (some fraction of) the websurfing public, which can be enlightening and empowering.  Yes, I understand the potential for abuse (both for privacy and for spam), but I&#039;d rather see them released in some form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had similar discussions with colleagues.  But we are interested in all queries, and similarly I&#8217;d love to see the web server logs for wikipedia (which I don&#8217;t seem to find anywhere).  Both provide some broad measures of the interests of (some fraction of) the websurfing public, which can be enlightening and empowering.  Yes, I understand the potential for abuse (both for privacy and for spam), but I&#8217;d rather see them released in some form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

