<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SearchWiki: A Platform for Steganography?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=910#comment-970</guid>
		<description>Yes, but that is at best looking for needles in a haystack. And I believe there are some computational complexity results on the relative difficulty of obfuscating vs. detecting obfuscation that strongly favor the obfuscators.  Even in a simplified model of stenography, I have to imagine that the detection problem is at least NP-hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but that is at best looking for needles in a haystack. And I believe there are some computational complexity results on the relative difficulty of obfuscating vs. detecting obfuscation that strongly favor the obfuscators.  Even in a simplified model of stenography, I have to imagine that the detection problem is at least NP-hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Ringdal</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Ringdal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=910#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Many attempts to read the hidden messages can be discovered by analyzing the search patterns of users, looking for users that regularly repeat the same search queries. By analyzing the results of those queries, it might be possible to get the messages prior to the persons it was intended to reach. 

Andreas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many attempts to read the hidden messages can be discovered by analyzing the search patterns of users, looking for users that regularly repeat the same search queries. By analyzing the results of those queries, it might be possible to get the messages prior to the persons it was intended to reach. </p>
<p>Andreas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=910#comment-959</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t doubt it. But I also don&#039;t think that SearchWiki changes the playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt it. But I also don&#8217;t think that SearchWiki changes the playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/26/searchwiki-a-platform-for-steganography/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=910#comment-958</guid>
		<description>It is very, very, very likely that steganography on a large scale, not only by terrorists, but also by any covert organization.

Sending encrypted emails to or from benladen@gmail.com just does not make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very, very, very likely that steganography on a large scale, not only by terrorists, but also by any covert organization.</p>
<p>Sending encrypted emails to or from <a href="mailto:benladen@gmail.com">benladen@gmail.com</a> just does not make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
