<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Intelligence Goes Back to the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/02/business-intelligence-goes-back-to-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/02/business-intelligence-goes-back-to-the-future/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/02/business-intelligence-goes-back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=731#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Yep. Now we just need to get academic researchers to agree as well.

Oh! And can anyone get GMail&#039;s spam filter talking to me? Machine learning is good and all, but blind machine learning is not very nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Now we just need to get academic researchers to agree as well.</p>
<p>Oh! And can anyone get GMail&#8217;s spam filter talking to me? Machine learning is good and all, but blind machine learning is not very nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/02/business-intelligence-goes-back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=731#comment-691</guid>
		<description>I hear you. We&#039;re trying to do some of that painting too, but you&#039;re right the we, and everyone in the BI space, have a ways to go. But I think a key success factor is presenting information in a way that catalyzes human insight, rather than over-relying on data mining to come up with that insight on its own. The painting is a cooperative process between the system and the user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you. We&#8217;re trying to do some of that painting too, but you&#8217;re right the we, and everyone in the BI space, have a ways to go. But I think a key success factor is presenting information in a way that catalyzes human insight, rather than over-relying on data mining to come up with that insight on its own. The painting is a cooperative process between the system and the user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lemire</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/11/02/business-intelligence-goes-back-to-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lemire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=731#comment-690</guid>
		<description>The business data we have now today is made of large sets of meaningless bits. What BI really is in 2008 is &quot;painting&quot;. You need to put all the bits together and tell a story. Aggregation is key.

I won&#039;t deny that good retrieval is important, and certainly we need products like the one you guys produce, but the future is in &quot;painting&quot;, not retrieving the &quot;dots&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The business data we have now today is made of large sets of meaningless bits. What BI really is in 2008 is &#8220;painting&#8221;. You need to put all the bits together and tell a story. Aggregation is key.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t deny that good retrieval is important, and certainly we need products like the one you guys produce, but the future is in &#8220;painting&#8221;, not retrieving the &#8220;dots&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
