Comments on: Freebasing http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/31/freebasing/ Mon, 21 May 2012 05:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Freebase Parallax http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/31/freebasing/comment-page-1/#comment-1015 Freebase Parallax Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:11:29 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=719#comment-1015 [...] (via The Noisy Channel) [...] [...] (via The Noisy Channel) [...]

]]> By: Daniel Lemire http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/31/freebasing/comment-page-1/#comment-673 Daniel Lemire Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:04:24 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=719#comment-673 I wrote something just like it with a post-doc, except that it uses only tag clouds. I even made a paper out of it: http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.2156 I bet they share a lot of my intuition, so maybe the intro. of my paper could help you. Their design however has one fundamental difference: they use "selection queries" (which architects did this) and they do not have much support for fancier aggregates and clustering... which we worked on. I wrote something just like it with a post-doc, except that it uses only tag clouds. I even made a paper out of it:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0710.2156

I bet they share a lot of my intuition, so maybe the intro. of my paper could help you.

Their design however has one fundamental difference: they use “selection queries” (which architects did this) and they do not have much support for fancier aggregates and clustering… which we worked on.

]]>