<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Getting MaverWiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/29/googles-getting-maverwiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/29/googles-getting-maverwiki/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google SearchWiki: An Interesting Take on PIM &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/29/googles-getting-maverwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-871</link>
		<dc:creator>Google SearchWiki: An Interesting Take on PIM &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=705#comment-871</guid>
		<description>[...] launched SearchWiki today&#8211;I hadn&#8217;t realized it was pre-launch when I blogged about it a few weeks ago. Here is their official description: Today we&#8217;re launching [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] launched SearchWiki today&#8211;I hadn&#8217;t realized it was pre-launch when I blogged about it a few weeks ago. Here is their official description: Today we&#8217;re launching [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/29/googles-getting-maverwiki/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=705#comment-657</guid>
		<description>From Googler Matt Cutts:

And just to dispel one more misconception that I saw a few people speculate on: if user A edits their search results, it doesn&#039;t affect the search results for user B.

There is an option for users to go check out notes left by other users, but that requires additional explicit work--by default, users don&#039;t see other users&#039; notes. And even if you do the work to see other users&#039; notes, other users&#039; changes don&#039;t affect your search rankings.

So this purely modifies your own search results rankings. So if you spam the rankings, you&#039;re only spamming the rankings for yourself. ;)

http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-searchwiki.html#c264089502535899205</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Googler Matt Cutts:</p>
<p>And just to dispel one more misconception that I saw a few people speculate on: if user A edits their search results, it doesn&#8217;t affect the search results for user B.</p>
<p>There is an option for users to go check out notes left by other users, but that requires additional explicit work&#8211;by default, users don&#8217;t see other users&#8217; notes. And even if you do the work to see other users&#8217; notes, other users&#8217; changes don&#8217;t affect your search rankings.</p>
<p>So this purely modifies your own search results rankings. So if you spam the rankings, you&#8217;re only spamming the rankings for yourself. <img src='http://thenoisychannel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-searchwiki.html#c264089502535899205" rel="nofollow">http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/10/google-searchwiki.html#c264089502535899205</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

