<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Grad Students Should Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/26/why-grad-students-should-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/26/why-grad-students-should-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs I Read: Daniel Lemire&#8217;s Blog &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/26/why-grad-students-should-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs I Read: Daniel Lemire&#8217;s Blog &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=677#comment-622</guid>
		<description>[...] RSS    &#160;     &#8592; Why Grad Students Should Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RSS    &nbsp;     &larr; Why Grad Students Should Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/26/why-grad-students-should-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=677#comment-621</guid>
		<description>Absolutely! I&#039;m still stewing over a reaction from someone I respect deeply telling me that, until the tenure process takes blogging into account, it is dangerous for his students to blog, lest they get scooped. I understand where he&#039;s coming from, but I think the benefits of broad exposure outweigh the risks of being scooped in the peer-reviewed venues.

I agree that this model applies broadly--both to other social media and outside academia. But I think academia is one of the strongest hold-outs against this use of social media, precisely because of the traditional role of peer-reviewed publication in defining a research career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! I&#8217;m still stewing over a reaction from someone I respect deeply telling me that, until the tenure process takes blogging into account, it is dangerous for his students to blog, lest they get scooped. I understand where he&#8217;s coming from, but I think the benefits of broad exposure outweigh the risks of being scooped in the peer-reviewed venues.</p>
<p>I agree that this model applies broadly&#8211;both to other social media and outside academia. But I think academia is one of the strongest hold-outs against this use of social media, precisely because of the traditional role of peer-reviewed publication in defining a research career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Gourley</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/10/26/why-grad-students-should-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Gourley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=677#comment-619</guid>
		<description>Dan, Thanks much for the post. I have to agree, and also believe this model applies to many others in the field.I imagine it also applies to other social media, like Twitter.

Cheers,
Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, Thanks much for the post. I have to agree, and also believe this model applies to many others in the field.I imagine it also applies to other social media, like Twitter.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

