<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving The Noisy Channel: A Call for Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=75#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Ah, that&#039;s a great idea, but I don&#039;t know how easy it will be to implement. Maybe it&#039;s as simple as creating topic-specific comment feeds and showing those on any post tagged with that topic. But I&#039;m not sure how that will work, since multiple comment feeds for each post could be confusing. But I&#039;ll mull over the concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s a great idea, but I don&#8217;t know how easy it will be to implement. Maybe it&#8217;s as simple as creating topic-specific comment feeds and showing those on any post tagged with that topic. But I&#8217;m not sure how that will work, since multiple comment feeds for each post could be confusing. But I&#8217;ll mull over the concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=75#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Daniel,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;While tags would help, I guess what I am also asking for is a comments section that operates at the topic level, rather than at the post level.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sure, you could tag each of your posts.  But then the comments threads would still be per-post.  There wouldn&#039;t be any sort of tag-global, or topic-global, way of carrying on a discussion around that topic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So tags are a good first step, but blogging platforms as a whole still need to evolve.  Tags don&#039;t solve everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>While tags would help, I guess what I am also asking for is a comments section that operates at the topic level, rather than at the post level.</p>
<p>Sure, you could tag each of your posts.  But then the comments threads would still be per-post.  There wouldn&#8217;t be any sort of tag-global, or topic-global, way of carrying on a discussion around that topic.</p>
<p>So tags are a good first step, but blogging platforms as a whole still need to evolve.  Tags don&#8217;t solve everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=75#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Jeremy, I think some of this will be possible in a more supporting blogging platform. I do use the tags on Blogger, but I&#039;m a bit haphazard about them, and I think I need to start being more systematic, now that I&#039;m approaching 100 posts. One thing I plan to do is look back on those posts and try to group them into overarching themes--not just to better organize them, but also to help ensure that those themes receive more attention in the future.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Oh, and I&#039;d seen Greg&#039;s blog before, but this was a good reminder to add it to my reader. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy, I think some of this will be possible in a more supporting blogging platform. I do use the tags on Blogger, but I&#8217;m a bit haphazard about them, and I think I need to start being more systematic, now that I&#8217;m approaching 100 posts. One thing I plan to do is look back on those posts and try to group them into overarching themes&#8211;not just to better organize them, but also to help ensure that those themes receive more attention in the future.</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;d seen Greg&#8217;s blog before, but this was a good reminder to add it to my reader. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=75#comment-195</guid>
		<description>It would be nice if blogs weren&#039;t so linear in their progression.. arranged by post date.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;d much rather see a blog that was arranged topically, with clusters of posts on similar themes.  That way, comments and participation in the blog wouldn&#039;t just disappear as time and posts marched on, but could be organized into some sort of database of knowledge and/or into a more permanent ongoing discussion about interesting, broad, recurring themes.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Within a theme, time-based linearity would still be ok, to some degree.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But what I really dislike about blogging is how broad themes get overwritten and lost, because of this &quot;sort by recency&quot; organization.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;(To a certain extent, Greg Linden does a nice job of overcoming this problem by, in a current post, linking back to the 2, 3 or sometimes even 5 previous posts that he&#039;s done over the past few years that are related to the current topic.  But as nice of a job as he does at this, it&#039;s still very much a manual process, and recent, interesting comments on those older posts still get lost forever just through the very organizational nature of the blog.)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Hey, that&#039;s a similar problem, almost, to the issue of a linear presentation of ranked results with in search engines!  Just going through search engine results linearly, like going through blog posts reverse-time linearly, obscures larger trends in the data!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So maybe all I am asking is for you to reinvent the whole platform of blogging. ;-)  But seriously, blogs need some way of pooling broader discussion and participation beyond just the per-post comments section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if blogs weren&#8217;t so linear in their progression.. arranged by post date.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see a blog that was arranged topically, with clusters of posts on similar themes.  That way, comments and participation in the blog wouldn&#8217;t just disappear as time and posts marched on, but could be organized into some sort of database of knowledge and/or into a more permanent ongoing discussion about interesting, broad, recurring themes.  </p>
<p>Within a theme, time-based linearity would still be ok, to some degree.  </p>
<p>But what I really dislike about blogging is how broad themes get overwritten and lost, because of this &#8220;sort by recency&#8221; organization.</p>
<p>(To a certain extent, Greg Linden does a nice job of overcoming this problem by, in a current post, linking back to the 2, 3 or sometimes even 5 previous posts that he&#8217;s done over the past few years that are related to the current topic.  But as nice of a job as he does at this, it&#8217;s still very much a manual process, and recent, interesting comments on those older posts still get lost forever just through the very organizational nature of the blog.)</p>
<p>Hey, that&#8217;s a similar problem, almost, to the issue of a linear presentation of ranked results with in search engines!  Just going through search engine results linearly, like going through blog posts reverse-time linearly, obscures larger trends in the data!</p>
<p>So maybe all I am asking is for you to reinvent the whole platform of blogging. <img src='http://thenoisychannel.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   But seriously, blogs need some way of pooling broader discussion and participation beyond just the per-post comments section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/08/28/improving-the-noisy-channel-a-call-for-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=75#comment-193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also posted a &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/blogging/TCH_BLG/307173-50510&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;request for advice&lt;/a&gt; on LinkedIn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also posted a <a HREF="http://www.linkedin.com/answers/technology/blogging/TCH_BLG/307173-50510" REL="nofollow">request for advice</a> on LinkedIn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

