Comments on: Resolving the Battle Royale between Information Retrieval and Information Science http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/07/06/resolving-the-battle-royale-between-information-retrieval-and-information-science/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:32:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Search Facets » IEEE works! But what works? http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/07/06/resolving-the-battle-royale-between-information-retrieval-and-information-science/comment-page-1/#comment-5491 Search Facets » IEEE works! But what works? Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:58:34 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=52#comment-5491 [...] — sliders, breadcrumbs, multi-select? Their interaction? Something else? As Daniel Tunkelang reminds us, we’re all still new at measuring the effects of HCIR, given the “battle royale” between the [...] [...] — sliders, breadcrumbs, multi-select? Their interaction? Something else? As Daniel Tunkelang reminds us, we’re all still new at measuring the effects of HCIR, given the “battle royale” between the [...]

]]> By: Catching up on SIGIR ‘08 | The Noisy Channel http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/07/06/resolving-the-battle-royale-between-information-retrieval-and-information-science/comment-page-1/#comment-450 Catching up on SIGIR ‘08 | The Noisy Channel Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:34:22 +0000 http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=52#comment-450 [...] A paper on whether test collections predict users’ effectiveness offers an admirable defense of the Cranfield paradigm, much along the lines I’ve been advocating. [...] [...] A paper on whether test collections predict users’ effectiveness offers an admirable defense of the Cranfield paradigm, much along the lines I’ve been advocating. [...]

]]>