<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is (not) Exploratory Search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: When Is Faceted Search Appropriate?</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator>When Is Faceted Search Appropriate?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-5152</guid>
		<description>[...] search supports exploratory use cases, in contrast to known-item search. For known-item search, users are better served by a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] search supports exploratory use cases, in contrast to known-item search. For known-item search, users are better served by a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exploring Explortatory Search &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4886</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploring Explortatory Search &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-4886</guid>
		<description>[...] term &#8220;exploratory search&#8220;. A while back, I tried to define exploratory search based on what it is not. This time, let me aim to positively characterize what I see as its two primary use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] term &#8220;exploratory search&#8220;. A while back, I tried to define exploratory search based on what it is not. This time, let me aim to positively characterize what I see as its two primary use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exploring Explortatory Search &#124; The Noisy Channel</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4887</link>
		<dc:creator>Exploring Explortatory Search &#124; The Noisy Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-4887</guid>
		<description>[...] term &#8220;exploratory search&#8220;. A while back, I tried to define exploratory search based on what it is not. This time, let me aim to positively characterize what I see as its two primary use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] term &#8220;exploratory search&#8220;. A while back, I tried to define exploratory search based on what it is not. This time, let me aim to positively characterize what I see as its two primary use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Max, thanks for the link! A colleague at Endeca also pointed me back to the 2002 CACM paper by Marti Hearst et al., &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=567498.567525&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Finding the flow in web site search&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max, thanks for the link! A colleague at Endeca also pointed me back to the 2002 CACM paper by Marti Hearst et al., <a HREF="http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=567498.567525" REL="nofollow">Finding the flow in web site search</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max L. Wilson</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Max L. Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-105</guid>
		<description>daniel, you might be interested to read what CWI (Amsterdam) put into JCDL08: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378889.1378897.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The report, really, showed that in the environment of museum curators, quick lookups were the minority case. they had an interesting breakdown of seeking types, but i think it was 63% that were information gathering tasks.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;have an excellent workshop!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>daniel, you might be interested to read what CWI (Amsterdam) put into JCDL08: <a href="http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378889.1378897" rel="nofollow">http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1378889.1378897</a>.</p>
<p>The report, really, showed that in the environment of museum curators, quick lookups were the minority case. they had an interesting breakdown of seeking types, but i think it was 63% that were information gathering tasks.</p>
<p>have an excellent workshop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Pavel, I like that breakdown of exploration, and it addresses my frustration with people who consider &quot;known item&quot; search as the antitheses of exploratory search.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As for non-exploratory search looking like a database system, my only counter-reaction is that I think of databases primarily as relational databases. In a relational database, the biggest challenge is understanding the schema well enough to construct the right queries. But I&#039;d agree with you in the context of a denormalized database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavel, I like that breakdown of exploration, and it addresses my frustration with people who consider &#8220;known item&#8221; search as the antitheses of exploratory search.</p>
<p>As for non-exploratory search looking like a database system, my only counter-reaction is that I think of databases primarily as relational databases. In a relational database, the biggest challenge is understanding the schema well enough to construct the right queries. But I&#8217;d agree with you in the context of a denormalized database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel Serdyukov</title>
		<link>http://thenoisychannel.com/2008/06/24/what-is-not-exploratory-search/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel Serdyukov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenoisychannel.com/?p=48#comment-103</guid>
		<description>If users know what and how to search something, then it more looks like a database system, doesn&#039;t it? Users know that it is indexed and know the key. It is hardly exploratory, of course. It is interesting to divide exploratory search also into three kinds: one helps to &quot;explore&quot; personal memory (re-find things, recall names for things), second helps to explore how to name a known thing to find it (navigational), and third helps to really discover the world - find things with desired features, or change desires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If users know what and how to search something, then it more looks like a database system, doesn&#8217;t it? Users know that it is indexed and know the key. It is hardly exploratory, of course. It is interesting to divide exploratory search also into three kinds: one helps to &#8220;explore&#8221; personal memory (re-find things, recall names for things), second helps to explore how to name a known thing to find it (navigational), and third helps to really discover the world &#8211; find things with desired features, or change desires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
